Constitutional Convention

by

I really think we are at a breaking point. The more I read about the events that preceded the Civil War, the more I realize we are heading down the wrong path.

On the one hand, we have a group of power-crazed individuals who use government to provide for their lifestyle. I really wish the problem were only on one side of the aisle, but it’s on both sides and it’s infected perhaps a majority of America itself. The evil of this kind of thinking can only be explained by comparing it to slavery. While slaves of times past were of a different skin color, ethnicity, and national origin, and while all the slaves were extremely poor, the new modern slaves are the hardworking Americans who actually provides for themselves and sacrifice to serve the country as a whole. These slaves wear the uniform or work the ten hour shifts. These slaves pay their own way through college and build companies with raw effort and sacrifice. These slaves know the value of a dollar, because they paid for every dollar they have with their blood, sweat, tears and time. The slave owners in this modern system are the rest of America who leech whatever they can off these productive members and, in distributing it to other leeches who feed at the public trough, keep a little for their pet projects or their personal use. Anyone who accepts a check from the government, or who benefits from government action at the expense of others, is a member of this class of slave owner.

On the other hand, we have the patriots. These are people who love America for being America, meaning, the land of the free and the home of the brave. These are people who have read the constitution and understand it. They have read the Declaration of Independence and have that second paragraph burned into their hearts. They know what freedom is about, that man is elevated above all other creatures by God’s divine gift, and that we, as men, are to stand up and live life without taking from anyone else what is rightfully theirs.

The country is at a tipping point because neither of the sides is backing down. As the patriots rise up in open rebellion, the slave owners get more vicious. It is obvious that the patriots are out-gunned and out-manned. The patriots are under-funded and under-represented.

However, there was a group of people who, before the Civil War, had strong feelings about slavery. They felt that as long as the country was trending towards abolition, everything was going to be okay. Even if the country as a whole stalled for a few decades, that would be acceptable. Heck, if the country took a few steps in the wrong direction, that wouldn’t be so upsetting since it could easily be turned around the other direction.

I think this represents the views of the vast majority of the patriots. They don’t like the socialist and progressive programs the governments throughout the land administer. But as long as we tend towards eliminating these programs, or at least marginalizing them, then that’s ok. Take, for instance, Social Security. The 401k and Roth IRAs are a javelin through the heart of Social Security. See, as tools become available to people to actually accumulate wealth for their own retirement, they will understand the great disservice that the Social Security program actually is. The new generation of people would want out, and a negotiation between the old and new generations could be hammered out that would spell the end of Social Security without cutting grandma off the teat.

What happened before the Civil War was a series of appalling defeats for the anti-slavery people. Little by little, it became apparent that slavery was not going to be gradually abolished. Rather, slavery was going to be expanded. Not just in the Northern States, but in the West as well. This was, obviously, not what they wanted. And if things continued, there was the possibility that slavery would be an eternal institution in our culture. Of course, the anti-slavery people attempted political solutions to these problems. However, the slavery industry was so powerful and so pervasive that there was no hope of grabbing control of the federal government. Slavery had penetrated both parties to such an extent that the anti-slavery people had no place to turn.

What happened next was a matter for the history books. The anti-slavery people rose up in rebellion against the government, society, and culture of slavery. They built the underground railroad. They had raids and armed revolts. They turned their guns on federal agents and otherwise did things that today we would be appalled by. As the response by the pro-slavery government grew more and more menacing, the popularity of the anti-slavery group became more apparent. One thing lead to another, and a new, third party was born out of a desire to abolish slavery once and for all. This was, of course, the Republican Party.

Today, the patriots realize that they are not only losing ground, but losing it in such a way that makes any reversal all but impossible. This means they are going to grow increasingly desperate and begin outright rebellion against the government. Will America flock to the movement of individual rights and freedom, or will they protect the institutionalization of socialism?

We have, of course, a way to head off all these things at the pass. It is something we should have tried before the first Civil War. That is, we get a bunch of delegates into a room, and they renegotiate the very structure of our country altogether. The states, independent of the federal government, have the power to completely alter or abolish the current system of government.

I propose that we create a new federal government, one vastly smaller than the existing one. It would look somewhat similar to the one we have, except with razor wire and automatic gun turrets installed in the locations the people have deemed off-limits to the federal government.

Such a framework will allow individual states to experiment with socialism to their heart’s desire. It will also allow other states to experiment with individual liberty. This means that the right and the left will no longer duke it out in the national arena. Rather, local elections and politics will be the new battleground. Any loss, no matter how significant, will never mean the end of the game to anyone. Those who grow truly disgusted with one state’s policies can leave to another state, rather than being trapped under an over-reaching and all-powerful federal entity.

Advertisements

2 Responses to “Constitutional Convention”

  1. statusquobuster Says:

    Thank You Mr. LeMunyon for Constitutional Truth

    Joel S. Hirschhorn

    For those of us advocating the first-time use of the Article V convention option in the US Constitution it seemed like heaven-sent blessing that the Wall Street Journal the other day published an oped article by Virginia state legislator James M. LeMunyon, a Republican. The headline conveyed the key message: A Constitutional Convention Can Rein in Washington.

    Okay, it would have been much preferred to avoid using the term constitutional convention and, instead, use Article V convention, because the language in Article V clearly limits a convention to amendments and prevents a wholesale rewriting of the constitution. Still, the article focused repeatedly on a most important theme that the public urgently needs to fully understand: There really is no remotely possible scenario of a runaway convention that would do terrible damage to the Constitution, either from the left or right. Thank You Mr. LeMunyon.

    LeMunyon did a masterful job of clarifying how the difficult job of ratifying any amendments proposed by a convention would have to get accepted by a large number of state legislative houses, with many controlled by Democrats and others by Republicans. Indeed, the state ratification requirement gives the safety net that sensible Americans must see as removing all fears of a damaging runaway convention. Why is this so important? Because convention opponents, mostly on the right, have for many years used the runaway convention argument to instill public fears about using the constitutional option of an Article V convention. It has made all those supposedly constitution-loving conservatives nothing more than constitutional hypocrites. With all their angry rhetoric about the many harms of the uncontrolled federal government they, nevertheless, have not seen what so many others, like LeMunyon, have seen: Using the Article V convention option is necessary to rein in Washington and all of the status quo corruption in the two-party plutocracy. Thank You Mr. LeMunyon.

    Rather than fear a convention of state delegates, people must fully appreciate that, as stated by LeMunyon, “Congress is in a state of serious disrepair and cannot fix itself.” Clearly Congress fears a convention, and what Congress fears we the people urgently need: the first Article V convention. The one major point not presented in the article is that, with over 700 applications from all 50 states, the one and only constitutional requirement for a convention has been met, but Congress has refused to obey the Constitution. So, state legislators like LeMunyon keep proposing new state legislation to submit still more applications for a convention. Until recently the whole historic set of state applications were not even made easily available for public scrutiny. Not by Congress or anyone else, until the nonpartisan Friends of the Article V Convention did so and made them available on their website.

    Regardless of all the sound information and arguments given by LeMunyon, his highly visible article has stimulated considerable negative, anti-convention writings on many right wing websites. This, despite the logic that there is so much more to fear and oppose than a convention. All this irrational and irresponsible fear-mongering merits careful thought. Exactly why do so many people who profess love and respect for the Founders and the Constitution keep opposing using what the Founders knew we would have to use when the public lost trust in the federal government? Why do these anti-convention people ignore what LeMunyon correctly noted? There have been hundreds of state constitutional conventions that did not wreck states.

    The baseless harangues by anti-convention screamers only act to maintain the political status quo and perpetuate the fiction that elections can succeed in sending enough radically different people to Congress and the White House to really reform and fix our nation. These people want to preserve their own organizations as means to oppose and fix the political and government system. They want to protect and retain their own perceived power and influence. They have had enough time and failed. Now it is time to use the Article V convention option.

    Thank You Mr. LeMunyon for making the case that only constitutional amendments have any hope of making systemic changes to fix the corrupt, inefficient and outright dysfunctional federal government. Power to the states!

    [Contact Joel S. Hirschhorn through delusionaldemocracy.com]

    • Jonathan Gardner Says:

      A bit long, but let’s see if I get the drift.

      1) Congress needs to be reformed. We see that clearly.

      2) Congress refuses to reform itself.

      3) It may be that the requirements for a constitutional convention have already been met. However. we can’t expect congress to act and certify that it has. It’s up to the states.

      4) People are genuinely worried about what may come out of the convention. But congress is truly terrified.

      I am beginning to, more and more, desire that the constitutional convention be moved forward. Whatever result comes out of it, it has to pass the high bar of being certified by the people of the states. Any radical change will have to be more fully explained than our presidential candidates are today.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: